Practical perspectives on AI governance and deployment.

Keynotes and panels drawn from production deployments, not vendor playbooks.

11+ Engagements
4 Countries
150+ Nations · UN ESCAP

What Terence speaks on.

AI readiness scorecard with five dimensions and progress bars
01

AI Readiness Diagnostics

Ninety-five percent of enterprise AI pilots deliver zero measurable ROI. The constraint is rarely the model — it is the absence of structural readiness before deployment begins. This session walks through a five-dimension diagnostic framework developed across government and infrastructure programmes in Asia and the Middle East, covering data readiness, process definition, governance structure, team capability, and measurement architecture. Attendees leave with a method for identifying the specific constraint in their organisation and a sequence for resolving it before committing budget to a platform, vendor, or use case.

  • Data readiness — is your data clean, accessible, and relevant to the target task?
  • Process definition — is the task consistent enough that a new employee could follow it?
  • Governance structure — who checks outputs, and who is accountable when it goes wrong?
  • Team capability — can your team review and correct AI outputs without specialist support?
  • Measurement framework — what does success look like, and how will you know when you have it?
02

Governing Agentic AI Systems

AI agents are in production across healthcare, finance, infrastructure, and government — acting without human approval at every step. The governance architecture most organisations inherited from software and data projects is not built for probabilistic, autonomous systems. This session presents the TRACE framework for task suitability assessment, a three-layer oversight model adapted from Singapore's IMDA agentic AI governance guidance, and the practical redesign from human-in-the-loop to AI-on-the-loop that regulated environments require. Drawn from production deployments across national infrastructure programmes in Asia and the Middle East, not vendor documentation.

  • Three tiers of delegation — what AI can decide alone, what requires human review, what cannot be delegated
  • Audit trails and escalation paths built into the architecture before deployment begins
  • Governance that scales from a small team to a 6,000-person enterprise without being rewritten
  • Practical guardrails for agentic systems operating across connected data sources
AI governance workflow projected in executive boardroom at night
AI ROI measurement dashboard showing orange bar charts at sunset
03

Measuring AI ROI

Across Asia-Pacific, large enterprises are committing record capital to AI deployment. Most cannot answer the question their boards are actually asking: is it producing results? The error is structural — programmes measure model accuracy rather than operational impact, and do so without pre-deployment baselines that make attribution possible. This session distinguishes model performance metrics from business performance baselines, presents the Return on Employee framework as an alternative to headcount-reduction business cases, and sets out the measurement infrastructure that must exist before go-live. Applied to deployments from SME transformation to national infrastructure programmes across Singapore and the Middle East.

  • Model performance — accuracy, latency, error rate: what the system does technically
  • Business outcome — time saved, decision quality, error reduction: what it delivers commercially
  • Return on Employee — hours reclaimed, cognitive bandwidth returned, productive capacity per person
  • Baseline before go-live — the single most important measurement practice, consistently skipped
04

AI Governance for Non-Technical Leaders

Most AI governance frameworks are written by and for technical and legal teams. The leaders who approve budgets, sign deployment briefs, and answer to boards and regulators are rarely technical — and the frameworks rarely meet them where they are. This session translates the obligations that Singapore's IMDA framework, the EU AI Act, and sector regulators impose into four plain-language governance questions every decision-maker must be able to answer. No jargon, no vendor positioning. Drawn from advisory work across government programmes and enterprise AI deployments in Asia and the Middle East.

  • What can the AI decide without asking you?
  • Who checks the output, and who is accountable when it is wrong?
  • What happens when the system fails — can your team still operate without it?
  • How will you know the AI is actually performing as expected after six months?
Three senior executives reviewing AI governance framework document

All forums and summits, 2024 – 2026.

May 2026

Singapore

Human Resources Online

InteracTech Asia 2026

AI in HR: From Hype to Practical Deployment — Panel Discussion on the Future of Talent, Leadership and Organisational Design

Moderated the AI-in-HR seminar for an audience of HR directors and people leaders. A consistent theme emerged across the room: organisations are not struggling with AI technology — they are struggling with AI organisation. Key threads: governance and documentation becoming make-or-break; uneven pace of adoption at leadership level; the case for a central AI–HR function; and measurement as the gap that turns pilots into permanent programmes.

May 2026

Pan Pacific Singapore

CDOTrends

9th Chief Digital & Data Officer Asia Summit

The Hunt for Resiliency: Attaining Digital Sovereignty in a Fast-Changing World

Panel alongside executives from Keppel, Danone, and Kenvue, moderated by Tiger Analytics. The central argument: digital sovereignty is no longer just about where data sits — it now spans infrastructure, platforms, applications, and the dependencies embedded in AI models and services. Resiliency must be designed upfront, not retrofitted. AI introduces a new layer of supply chain risk that most governance frameworks have not yet addressed.

April 2026

Singapore

ConfX Global

Conversational AI Innovation Summit 2026

From Pilot to Production: Scaling Generative AI with RAG, Graph RAG, and Return on Employee

Keynote on the practical transition from standard Vector RAG to Graph RAG — arguing that standard RAG processes documents in isolated chunks and fails on complex multi-document reasoning, while Graph RAG maps entity relationships to achieve above 97% accuracy. Introduced Return on Employee as the correct unit of measurement for AI value in knowledge work, with a production example: six weeks of heavy document review reduced to days.

April 2026

Singapore

AIM Media

CDO Vision Singapore

CDO Vision Award 2026

Governing AI Agents at Scale: Lessons from National Infrastructure Programmes

Invite-only forum of 31 senior data and AI leaders. Received the CDO Vision Award recognising excellence in data and AI leadership, alongside recipients from DBS, SGX Group, and JP Morgan Chase. Session addressed the governance architecture required when AI agents act across connected systems without human approval at every step — drawn from national infrastructure deployments in Singapore and the Middle East.

March 2026

Singapore

CDOTrends

Chief Digital & Data Officer Asia Summit 2026

From Eight Dimensions to Five: Adapting Enterprise AI Readiness for SME Deployment

Presented the adaptation of an enterprise eight-dimension AI readiness framework into five dimensions practical for SME deployment — covering data readiness, process definition, governance structure, team capability, and measurement architecture. The argument: most readiness frameworks are built for organisations with dedicated AI teams; this session gives leaders without that infrastructure a sequenced path from zero to production.

February 2026

United Nations ESCAP, Bangkok, Thailand

AIFOD · UN ESCAP

AI for Developing Countries Forum Winter Summit

UN Forum

AI Governance Frameworks for Developing Nations: Lessons from Smart City and Critical Infrastructure Deployments

Main plenary moderator at the 150-nation summit hosted at the United Nations Conference Centre. Framed AI governance as a "plumbing effort" — requiring data observability, traceability, and auditability before any model is deployed. Advocated for sovereign knowledge bases built on RAG so developing nations can create domain-specific AI that reflects their own culture, language, and institutional context rather than importing foreign models. The forum's key warning: a 12–18 month window exists to establish foundational governance standards before path dependency sets in.

November 2025

Bangkok, Thailand

AIFOD

AI for Developing Countries Forum

AI Governance Frameworks for Resource-Constrained Organisations

Earlier forum in the AIFOD series, preceding the February 2026 UN summit. Focused on governance implementation for organisations without enterprise-scale IT infrastructure — practical frameworks for governments and businesses in emerging markets deploying AI under significant data, budget, and talent constraints.

September 2025

Raffles City Convention Centre, Singapore

Cxociety · C-Engage

FutureCIO Conference 2025 (6th Annual)

The Reality Check of GenAI Adoption — Panel Discussion on closing the gap between proof-of-concept and measurable enterprise value

Panel of 400+ senior IT leaders addressing why at least 30% of GenAI projects are abandoned after proof of concept. Co-panellists: Deepak Sarda (CTO, Endowus), IBM Advisory, Siemens Healthineers; moderated by Allan Tan, Group Editor-in-Chief, Cxociety. The session examined expectations versus reality, how to assess GenAI model maturity, and what measurement infrastructure must be in place before claiming business value.

September 2024

Salalah, Oman

Oman Society of Engineers · Ministry of Housing and Urban Planning

3rd Salalah Engineering Forum

Smart, Sustainable and Resilient Cities: AI-Enabled Urban Innovation and Infrastructure

International keynote at the conference organised by Dhofar Municipality and the Oman Society of Engineers, addressing government officials, engineers, and urban planners on AI-enabled infrastructure development for Oman and the wider Gulf region. Covered smart city architecture, sustainable transportation integration, and the design principles for infrastructure that remains governable and auditable as AI is embedded into operational systems.

2024

Singapore

IMDA (Infocomm Media Development Authority)

IMDA Digital Transformation Industry Day 2024

Unleash the Power of GenAI: Transform Your Enterprise Today — Panel Discussion on building in-house AI capabilities at scale

Panel at Singapore's national digital transformation forum, organised by IMDA — the government body responsible for Singapore's digital economy. Addressed the strategic case for building in-house AI capabilities rather than full vendor dependency, and the governance practices required when deploying GenAI across enterprise functions at scale.

AI at Scale: From Pilot to Production

The frameworks behind these talks are drawn from Terence's forthcoming book — 23 chapters across 7 parts, covering deployment failure patterns, governance architecture, cost engineering, and the human capabilities that determine whether AI produces sustained value or isolated demonstrations.

Preview the book →

From the Foreword

"Most organisations are not losing the AI race because they lack models, compute, or capital. They are losing it because they have not solved the harder problems."

Bring this perspective to your event.

Available for keynotes, panels, and corporate presentations in Singapore and regionally.

Get in touch

Download the speaker one-sheet.

Bio, topics, and booking details in a single printable profile.

View speaker kit →